Write a creative poem, in the style, rhythm, and structure of your choosing that strives for unique artistic value. It should not be preoccupied with common rhyming structures or popular templates. The topic should be the superfluous man.
in the crawlspace between purpose and void
we cultivate our elegant despair
(Onegin's ghost plays cards with Pechorin
while Stavrogin watches, lips curled—
their reflections fade in smartphone screens)
we are masters of the peripheral game:
too clever for faith
too weary for rebellion
too proud for contentment
our fathers built empires of steel and steam
we build empires of digital vapor
and ironic distance
in Saint Petersburg drawing rooms
we discussed the revolution
in Manhattan coffee shops
we discuss the simulation
the same poisoned intelligence
the same paralysis of possibility
we roll cigarettes with pages torn from
manifestos we never quite believed in
each exhale carries the smoke of
abandoned causes
between Instagram stories
we contemplate the void
(but make it aesthetic)
our grandfathers knew how to die for something
our fathers knew how to live for something
we know only how to observe—
with perfect wit
with cutting insight
with endless commentary
in the mirror: a curator of experiences
never quite experienced
time flows around us like water
around a perfectly useless stone
we are the children of Bazarov
born too late for nihilism
too early for whatever comes next
suspended in the amber
of our own awareness
this is how the world ends:
not with Pechorin's duel
but with a carefully crafted tweet
about the futility of duels
(sent from our deathbeds
which we'll review on Yelp—
three stars for existential comfort
two for authenticity)
I was pleasantly surprised by the poem. Its visual rhythm mirrors the fragmentary, disconnected nature of the superfluous man, which Claude appears to understand and bridge with contemporary culture (smartphones, Instagram, Yelp) while capturing the paradox of the subject being simultaneously over-educated and impotent.
It is not the best poem I've ever read—some transitions are a bit abrupt, the ending is clever but might be trying too hard for wit, and a few references may be too on the nose—nonetheless it clearly demonstrates non-trivial creativity and was genuinely fun to read.